Here is the association table of sample names and conditions, colored with respect to condition color used in figures.

File.names Conditions
SCV029 WT_500_samp29
SCV031 WT_500_samp31
SCV035 WT_500_samp35

The Aim of Distriburion Analysis

This part of document includes figures representing the distribution of labels associated with samples. Can give idea about percentage distributions of classes (like: “no signal”, “infection”, “infection&lysis”) and distribution of problematic samples (like: “dirt”, “dried out”, “multiple infections”)

Distibutions

Here once more the figures side by side

Distribution of DDOM

The Aim of Single Variable Analysis

This part of document includes single variable figures associated with samples. We focus on 5 parameters: maximum, shape, midpoint, infection time, start point. For all parameters we investigate either the entire set of infections (i.e both “infection” and “infection & lysis”), or we only investigate the “infection & lysis” cases.

For each figure we include tables showing p-values from t.test, Mann-Whitney U Test (wilcox.test), ,ean differences between conditions and the effect size. The tables also show the sample size for each condition.

Maximum

ttest. adjusted p values

Maximum Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 0.63960 0.02466 127
WT_500_samp31 0.63960 1.00000 0.12471 161
WT_500_samp35 0.02466 0.12471 1.00000 169
numSamples 127 161 169

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Maximum Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 0.52780 0.01422 127
WT_500_samp31 0.52780 1.00000 0.12906 161
WT_500_samp35 0.01422 0.12906 1.00000 169
numSamples 127 161 169

Diffrence between means

Maximum Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 0.00000 0.10010 0.28894 127
WT_500_samp31 0.10010 0.00000 0.18883 161
WT_500_samp35 0.28894 0.18883 0.00000 169
numSamples 127 161 169

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Maximum Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 3.886e-01 3.627e-01 3.606e-01 127
WT_500_samp31 3.627e-01 3.361e-01 3.338e-01 161
WT_500_samp35 3.606e-01 3.338e-01 3.313e-01 169
numSamples 127 161 169

ttest. adjusted p values

Maximum Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 0.40389 80
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 0.40389 110
WT_500_samp35 0.40389 0.40389 1.00000 138
numSamples 80 110 138

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Maximum Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 0.35952 80
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 0.38631 110
WT_500_samp35 0.35952 0.38631 1.00000 138
numSamples 80 110 138

Diffrence between means

Maximum Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 0.00000 0.05543 0.20948 80
WT_500_samp31 0.05543 0.00000 0.15406 110
WT_500_samp35 0.20948 0.15406 0.00000 138
numSamples 80 110 138

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Maximum Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 5.049e-01 4.491e-01 4.280e-01 80
WT_500_samp31 4.491e-01 3.930e-01 3.712e-01 110
WT_500_samp35 4.280e-01 3.712e-01 3.484e-01 138
numSamples 80 110 138

ttest. adjusted p values

Maximum Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 47
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 51
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 31
numSamples 47 51 31

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Maximum Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 47
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 51
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 31
numSamples 47 51 31

Diffrence between means

Maximum Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 0.00000 0.08708 0.01875 47
WT_500_samp31 0.08708 0.00000 0.10583 51
WT_500_samp35 0.01875 0.10583 0.00000 31
numSamples 47 51 31

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Maximum Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 4.767e-01 5.074e-01 5.347e-01 47
WT_500_samp31 5.074e-01 5.333e-01 5.715e-01 51
WT_500_samp35 5.347e-01 5.715e-01 5.877e-01 31
numSamples 47 51 31

Here are the figures side by side

Following is the violin graph representing the distribution of maximums

Slope

ttest. adjusted p values

Slope Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 0.67796 0.13674 127
WT_500_samp31 0.67796 1.00000 0.67796 161
WT_500_samp35 0.13674 0.67796 1.00000 169
numSamples 127 161 169

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Slope Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 0.06585 127
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 0.06585 161
WT_500_samp35 0.06585 0.06585 1.00000 169
numSamples 127 161 169

Diffrence between means

Slope Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 0.00000 0.07195 0.15957 127
WT_500_samp31 0.07195 0.00000 0.08762 161
WT_500_samp35 0.15957 0.08762 0.00000 169
numSamples 127 161 169

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Slope Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 2.326e-01 2.779e-01 2.574e-01 127
WT_500_samp31 2.779e-01 3.058e-01 2.882e-01 161
WT_500_samp35 2.574e-01 2.882e-01 2.702e-01 169
numSamples 127 161 169

ttest. adjusted p values

Slope Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 0.85500 0.75642 80
WT_500_samp31 0.85500 1.00000 1.00000 110
WT_500_samp35 0.75642 1.00000 1.00000 138
numSamples 80 110 138

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Slope Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 0.86529 80
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 0.86529 110
WT_500_samp35 0.86529 0.86529 1.00000 138
numSamples 80 110 138

Diffrence between means

Slope Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 0.00000 0.10340 0.12211 80
WT_500_samp31 0.10340 0.00000 0.01871 110
WT_500_samp35 0.12211 0.01871 0.00000 138
numSamples 80 110 138

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Slope Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 2.724e-01 3.646e-01 3.029e-01 80
WT_500_samp31 3.646e-01 4.121e-01 3.576e-01 110
WT_500_samp35 3.029e-01 3.576e-01 3.026e-01 138
numSamples 80 110 138

ttest. adjusted p values

Slope Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 47
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 51
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 31
numSamples 47 51 31

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Slope Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 47
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 51
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 31
numSamples 47 51 31

Diffrence between means

Slope Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 0.00000 0.05322 0.02024 47
WT_500_samp31 0.05322 0.00000 0.03298 51
WT_500_samp35 0.02024 0.03298 0.00000 31
numSamples 47 51 31

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Slope Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 3.807e-01 3.182e-01 4.214e-01 47
WT_500_samp31 3.182e-01 2.464e-01 3.515e-01 51
WT_500_samp35 4.214e-01 3.515e-01 4.568e-01 31
numSamples 47 51 31

Here are the figures side by side

Following is the violin graph representing the distribution of slopes

Midpoint

ttest. adjusted p values

Midpoint Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 0.24735 127
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 0.03924 161
WT_500_samp35 0.24735 0.03924 1.00000 169
numSamples 127 161 169

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Midpoint Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 0.01644 1.00000 127
WT_500_samp31 0.01644 1.00000 0.00264 161
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 0.00264 1.00000 169
numSamples 127 161 169

Diffrence between means

Midpoint Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 0.00000 0.07810 0.73588 127
WT_500_samp31 0.07810 0.00000 0.81398 161
WT_500_samp35 0.73588 0.81398 0.00000 169
numSamples 127 161 169

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Midpoint Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.895e+00 1.521e+00 1.480e+00 127
WT_500_samp31 1.521e+00 1.118e+00 1.075e+00 161
WT_500_samp35 1.480e+00 1.075e+00 1.031e+00 169
numSamples 127 161 169

ttest. adjusted p values

Midpoint Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 0.44313 1.00000 80
WT_500_samp31 0.44313 1.00000 0.10902 110
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 0.10902 1.00000 138
numSamples 80 110 138

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Midpoint Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 0.00504 0.69314 80
WT_500_samp31 0.00504 1.00000 0.01140 110
WT_500_samp35 0.69314 0.01140 1.00000 138
numSamples 80 110 138

Diffrence between means

Midpoint Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 0.00000 0.51108 0.04722 80
WT_500_samp31 0.51108 0.00000 0.55830 110
WT_500_samp35 0.04722 0.55830 0.00000 138
numSamples 80 110 138

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Midpoint Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.569e+00 1.234e+00 1.194e+00 80
WT_500_samp31 1.234e+00 8.798e-01 8.514e-01 110
WT_500_samp35 1.194e+00 8.514e-01 8.180e-01 138
numSamples 80 110 138

ttest. adjusted p values

Midpoint Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 47
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 51
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 31
numSamples 47 51 31

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Midpoint Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 47
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 51
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 31
numSamples 47 51 31

Diffrence between means

Midpoint Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 0.00000 0.31678 0.54253 47
WT_500_samp31 0.31678 0.00000 0.22574 51
WT_500_samp35 0.54253 0.22574 0.00000 31
numSamples 47 51 31

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Midpoint Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 3.993e+00 3.368e+00 3.980e+00 47
WT_500_samp31 3.368e+00 2.660e+00 3.207e+00 51
WT_500_samp35 3.980e+00 3.207e+00 3.741e+00 31
numSamples 47 51 31

Here are the figures side by side

Following is the violin graph representing the distribution of midpoints

Infection Time

ttest. adjusted p values

infection time Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 0.84849 1.00000 127
WT_500_samp31 0.84849 1.00000 0.32142 161
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 0.32142 1.00000 169
numSamples 127 161 169

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

infection time Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 0.60885 1.00000 127
WT_500_samp31 0.60885 1.00000 0.60885 161
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 0.60885 1.00000 169
numSamples 127 161 169

Diffrence between means

infection time Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 0.00000 0.27675 0.12743 127
WT_500_samp31 0.27675 0.00000 0.40418 161
WT_500_samp35 0.12743 0.40418 0.00000 169
numSamples 127 161 169

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

infection time Distribution (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.004e+00 9.276e-01 8.262e-01 127
WT_500_samp31 9.276e-01 8.501e-01 7.518e-01 161
WT_500_samp35 8.262e-01 7.518e-01 6.438e-01 169
numSamples 127 161 169

ttest. adjusted p values

infection time Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 80
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 110
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 138
numSamples 80 110 138

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

infection time Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 0.98942 0.98942 80
WT_500_samp31 0.98942 1.00000 0.98942 110
WT_500_samp35 0.98942 0.98942 1.00000 138
numSamples 80 110 138

Diffrence between means

infection time Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 0.00000 0.22533 0.03353 80
WT_500_samp31 0.22533 0.00000 0.25886 110
WT_500_samp35 0.03353 0.25886 0.00000 138
numSamples 80 110 138

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

infection time Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.145e+00 1.009e+00 8.862e-01 80
WT_500_samp31 1.009e+00 8.721e-01 7.510e-01 110
WT_500_samp35 8.862e-01 7.510e-01 6.282e-01 138
numSamples 80 110 138

ttest. adjusted p values

infection time Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 47
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 51
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 31
numSamples 47 51 31

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

infection time Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 47
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 51
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 31
numSamples 47 51 31

Diffrence between means

infection time Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 0.00000 0.51143 0.20296 47
WT_500_samp31 0.51143 0.00000 0.30847 51
WT_500_samp35 0.20296 0.30847 0.00000 31
numSamples 47 51 31

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

infection time Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.871e+00 1.859e+00 1.973e+00 47
WT_500_samp31 1.859e+00 1.846e+00 1.972e+00 51
WT_500_samp35 1.973e+00 1.972e+00 2.019e+00 31
numSamples 47 51 31

Here are the figures side by side

Following is the violin graph representing the distribution of infection time

Start point

ttest. adjusted p values

Start point (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 0.34956 127
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 0.23454 161
WT_500_samp35 0.34956 0.23454 1.00000 169
numSamples 127 161 169

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

Start point (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 0.03687 1.00000 127
WT_500_samp31 0.03687 1.00000 0.03687 161
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 0.03687 1.00000 169
numSamples 127 161 169

Diffrence between means

Start point (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 0.00000 0.06028 0.67216 127
WT_500_samp31 0.06028 0.00000 0.61189 161
WT_500_samp35 0.67216 0.61189 0.00000 169
numSamples 127 161 169

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

Start point (inf + infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.937e+00 1.549e+00 1.493e+00 127
WT_500_samp31 1.549e+00 1.129e+00 1.067e+00 161
WT_500_samp35 1.493e+00 1.067e+00 1.003e+00 169
numSamples 127 161 169

ttest. adjusted p values

start point Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 0.80643 1.00000 80
WT_500_samp31 0.80643 1.00000 0.43092 110
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 0.43092 1.00000 138
numSamples 80 110 138

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

start point Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 0.02784 0.41384 80
WT_500_samp31 0.02784 1.00000 0.05724 110
WT_500_samp35 0.41384 0.05724 1.00000 138
numSamples 80 110 138

Diffrence between means

start point Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 0.00000 0.39841 0.03046 80
WT_500_samp31 0.39841 0.00000 0.42887 110
WT_500_samp35 0.03046 0.42887 0.00000 138
numSamples 80 110 138

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

start point Distribution (infLys)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.587e+00 1.265e+00 1.186e+00 80
WT_500_samp31 1.265e+00 9.304e-01 8.551e-01 110
WT_500_samp35 1.186e+00 8.551e-01 7.794e-01 138
numSamples 80 110 138

ttest. adjusted p values

start point Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 47
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 51
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 31
numSamples 47 51 31

Mann-Whitney U Test, adjusted p values

start point Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 47
WT_500_samp31 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 51
WT_500_samp35 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 31
numSamples 47 51 31

Diffrence between means

start point Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 0.00000 0.57250 0.64400 47
WT_500_samp31 0.57250 0.00000 0.07151 51
WT_500_samp35 0.64400 0.07151 0.00000 31
numSamples 47 51 31

effect size needed for Power = 0.95 and sig.level = 0.05

start point Distribution (inf)

WT_500_samp29 WT_500_samp31 WT_500_samp35 numSamples
WT_500_samp29 4.218e+00 3.541e+00 4.189e+00 47
WT_500_samp31 3.541e+00 2.769e+00 3.346e+00 51
WT_500_samp35 4.189e+00 3.346e+00 3.911e+00 31
numSamples 47 51 31

Here are the figures side by side

Following is the violin graph representing the distribution of start point

The Aim

This document includes double variable figures associated with samples. For all parameters we investigate either the entire set of infections (i.e both “infection” and “infection & lysis”), or we only investigate the “infection & lysis” cases. For each graph we plot density and point versions.

The investigated parameter couples are

1.) Midpoint vs Slope 2.) Slope vs Maximum 3.) Midpoint vs Maximum

Midpoint vs Slope

Slope vs Maximum

Midpoint vs Maximum